论文部分内容阅读
编辑在中医药学术论文审稿过程中经常遇到医案、医话、经验总结、医论等特殊体裁的论文。这些体裁的论文如属临床内容的,蕴含着经验个性化,其质量按国际通用的随机、双盲、对照的试验方法难以作出肯定评价的问题;如属研究古代医药文献的,作者往往没有通过定量方法来综合数据,加上学术界对现代科技文献利用的研究结果认为生物医学的大部分文献老化速度较快,使编辑对该类论文的价值和文章论据的取舍方法产生怀疑。本文从中医药学的学科特点分析,认为:在中医药发展进程中,必然出现传统与现代论文体裁并存的局面;编辑在审稿过程中,应不以论文体裁的差异作为取舍论文的标准,这与倡导设计严谨的研究方法,推动中医药走向世界的导向并无冲突;中医药古代文献浩如烟海,其典籍的价值有如人文学科的经典之作,具有跨时空特征,应提倡多种方法进行研究。
Editing in the review process of Chinese medicine papers are often encountered medical records, medical words, experience summary, medical theory and other special essays. These genres of the essay as clinical content, contains the experience of individual, its quality according to internationally accepted randomized, double-blind, controlled test method is difficult to make a positive assessment of the problem; in the case of the study of ancient medical literature, the author often did not pass Quantitative methods to synthesize data and academic research on the use of modern scientific literature suggest that the majority of biomedical literature has been aging at a faster rate, giving editors a doubt as to the value of such papers and the trade-offs in article arguments. This article analyzes the characteristics of traditional Chinese medicine from the point of view of the characteristics of traditional Chinese medicine, that: in the process of development of traditional Chinese medicine, there must be the traditional and modern style of the coexistence of the essay; editors in the peer review process, should not take the differences in essay as the standard choice of papers, which There is no conflict with advocating the rigorous design of research methods and promoting the orientation of Chinese medicine to the world. The ancient Chinese literature is full of literature. The value of the ancient Chinese medicine is like the classic of humanities, which has the characteristics of spanning time and space. Many methods should be advocated.