论文部分内容阅读
反垄断法损害赔偿与民事损害赔偿制度在目的设置上存在着巨大的分野,反垄断法损害赔偿制度的主要目的是制造必要的威慑,以便阻止违法行为的发生,同时激励私人参与反垄断法的实施,而民事损害赔偿的基本目的是为了填补受害人的损失。相较于民事损害赔偿制度,反垄断法损害赔偿制度在具体构成要件上有独特内涵。在具体实施领域,反垄断法损害赔偿在管辖法院、公权力机关介入程度、请求权诉讼时效等方面都与民事损害赔偿存在差异。上述差异共同决定了反垄断法损害赔偿不能根据民法有关损害赔偿的规定来提起,只能根据反垄断法来主张。我国《反垄断法》关于民事责任的规定较为简略,不便于反垄断法损害赔偿的实现,必须在实施环节予以展开。
There are huge differences between the antitrust damages and the civil damages system in the setting of objectives. The main purpose of the antitrust damage compensation system is to create the necessary deterrence in order to stop the illegal acts and encourage private participation in the anti-monopoly law The basic purpose of compensation for civil damages is to fill the victims’ losses. Compared with the system of civil damages, the damage compensation system of antitrust law has unique connotations in terms of the specific components. In the field of practical implementation, damages of antitrust law are different from damages of civil damages in the jurisdiction court, the degree of involvement of public authorities, the limitation of action of the right of claim and so on. The above differences all determine that the damages of antitrust law can not be filed under the provisions of civil law regarding damages, and can only be claimed according to the antitrust law. China’s “Anti-monopoly Law” on the provisions of civil liability is relatively simple, inconvenient for the realization of the Damages of Antitrust Law, must be carried out in the implementation process.