论文部分内容阅读
萧懿是南齐末年的重臣,又是梁武帝萧衍的嫡长兄,他的作为对于齐梁之际的历史发展产生了重要的影响。但这样一位齐梁易代之际的重要历史人物,《南齐书》认为他应是梁史记载的人物,而《梁书》却认为他应是齐史记载的人物,由此导致他在《南齐书》与《梁书》中均没有自己的列传。萧懿的情况充分体现了纪传体史书在处理易代之际历史人物归属时的复杂性。而在这一现象的背后,折射出史家对于人物断代问题的认识受其自身所处时代背景的影响。
Xiao Yi was a minister of the Southern Qi Dynasty and a brother-in-law of Xiao Yan of Emperor Wudi. His actions had an important influence on the historical development of Qi and Liang. However, such an important historic figure from the time of Qi and Liang Dynasties, “South Qi Book” thinks that he should be recorded in the history of Liang Shi, but “Liang Shu” thinks that he should be the person recorded in Qi history, Book “and” Liang Shu "does not have their own biography. Xiao Yi’s situation fully embodies the complexity of historical biography of the annals of history when dealing with the generation of historical figures belong to the occasion. Behind this phenomenon, it reflects that the historians’ understanding of the problem of the dating of characters is influenced by the background of their times.