论文部分内容阅读
笔者在本刊4卷2期发表了“关于修改抗震规范砂土液化判别式的几点意见”一文(以下简称“原文”),刘颖同志对该文作了讨论(以下简称:“讨论”),笔者对所提问题作了答复(以下简称“答复”), “讨论”与“答复”一起发表在本刊5卷1期。现在刘颖同志又提了商榷(以下简称“再讨论”),笔者在此再一次答复(以下简称“再答复”)。 “再讨论”中提出的问题,不少在“讨沦”中已经提出,在“答复”中已经说明,如无新内容和补充, “再答复”中就不再重复,各自保留自己的意见好了。
The author published a paper entitled “Several Opinions on Amendment of Seismic Standard for Sand Liquefaction Discrimination” (Article 4, Issue 2) (hereinafter referred to as the “original”), which Comrade Liu Ying discussed (hereinafter referred to as “discussion” ), The author made a reply to the questions raised (hereinafter referred to as the “reply”), and the “discussion” and the “reply” were published in this issue. Now that Comrade Liu Ying has held another discussion (hereinafter referred to as “re-discussion”), the author hereby replies again (hereinafter referred to as “re-reply”). Many of the issues raised in the “re-discussion” have already been put forward in “discussion on mercy.” In the “reply” it has already been stated that no new content or supplement will be repeated in the “replies” and each will keep its own opinions All right.