论文部分内容阅读
作为一项协调法院与仲裁庭管辖权冲突的主要原则,管辖权自裁原则在抑制平行程序方面被寄予厚望,然而《纽约公约》规定的过于粗糙、以及不同国家对该原则解读的分歧在很大程序上阻碍了该原则在协调平行程序方面的作用。为此,国际社会主张统一管辖权自裁原则的消极效力,明确仲裁地法院在仲裁协议效力审查上的终局作用以消除法院与仲裁庭的管辖权冲突。
As one of the main principles for reconciling the jurisdictional conflicts between courts and arbitral tribunals, the principle of jurisdictional autonomy is placed high on the suppression of parallel proceedings. However, the New York Convention stipulates that it is too rough and the divergence between different countries in interpreting this principle is very large Procedure hinders the role of the principle in coordinating parallel procedures. To this end, the international community advocates the negative effect of the principle of autonomy of unified jurisdiction and clarifies the final role of the courts of arbitration in reviewing the validity of arbitration agreements, so as to eliminate the conflict of jurisdiction between courts and tribunals.