论文部分内容阅读
2001年10月27日新修订的商标法、2002年8月3日颁布的商标法实施条例和2002年10月16日发布的《最高人民法院关于审理商标民事纠纷案件适用法律若干问题的解释》(以下简称《商标解释》)等商标法律、法规和司法解释标志着我国商标法律体系正日趋完善。近几年来,人民法院受理的商标民事纠纷案件呈迅速增长态势,且新情况、新问题不断涌现。为此,我们加强了对商标民事纠纷案件审判工作的总结,对商标司法审判实践中的许多重大、疑难问题提出了初步的解决意见。一、关于商标权的范围审理侵犯商标权案件,准确判断是否构成侵权首先在于正确把握商标权的保护范围。理论上将商标权的范围分成两个部分,一个是专用权,即权利人只能在经国家商标行政主管机关核定的商品上使用自己的注册商标;一个是禁用权,即权利人可
The Trademark Law revised on October 27, 2001, the Implementing Regulations of the Trademark Law promulgated on August 3, 2002 and the Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Civil Disputes over Trademarks released on October 16, 2002, (Hereinafter referred to as “Trademark Interpretation”) and other trademark laws, regulations and judicial interpretations indicate that our trademark law system is perfecting day by day. In recent years, cases involving trademark civil disputes accepted by the people's courts have been rapidly increasing, and new situations and new problems are constantly emerging. To this end, we have strengthened the review of trials of civil trademark dispute cases and put forward preliminary solutions to many important and difficult issues in the practice of trademark judicial trials. First, on the scope of trademark rights Trial cases of trademark infringement, an accurate judgment of whether the infringement consists of the correct grasp of the scope of the protection of trademark rights. Theoretically, the scope of trademark rights is divided into two parts, one is the exclusive right, that is, the right holder can only use his registered trademark on the goods approved by the administrative department of national trademark; one is the right of disabling, that is,