论文部分内容阅读
有关蜀石经的续刻、补刻问题,由于保存下来的原始资料有限,有些问题在南宋时已在疑似之间。本文在前人研究的基础上,考察相关文献记载及传世拓本残卷,主要就四个问题进行研讨:1.《左传》之为蜀刻亦或宋刻?我们认同清人和刘体乾的说法,推证《左传》确为蜀刻。2.《公羊》、《榖梁》二传是否田况补刻?我们发现了与田况有文字往还的蜀人吕陶的一篇文章,其中明确提到了田况补刻《公》、《榖》,这是有说服力的。3.补刻《孟子》者为席贡还是席旦?我们通过对二人仕履的考察,确认补刻《孟子》者为席贡。4.蜀石经的版本依据和晁公武《石经考异》的关系如何?我们试图厘清唐开成石经、五代监本九经、北宋国子监本与蜀石经之间的关系。
Concerning the continued engraving and remixing of Shu Scriptures, some of the problems were suspect in the Southern Song Dynasty due to the limited source material preserved. On the basis of previous studies, this paper examines the relevant literature records and the book of Tuobu fragments, mainly on four issues: 1. , Infer that “Zuo Zhuan” indeed Shu engraved. 2. Did the second passage of the “Rams” and “Beiliang” make an imprint? We found an article by Lu Tao, “榖” This is convincing. 3. Engraved “Mencius” for Xi Gong or Cidian? Through our investigation of the two men, we confirmed that engraved “Mencius” as Xi Gong. 4. What is the relationship between Shu edition and Chao Gongwu’s “Shi Jing Dao Yi”? We try to clarify the relationship between Tang Kai Cheng Shi Jing, Five Dynasties Supervisor’s Book Nine, Northern Song Guo Zi Jian Ben and Shu Shi Jing.