论文部分内容阅读
多年来,图书馆界一直在对同类图书排列的方法问题进行着探讨,其争论的焦点主要是使用种次号好,还是使用著者号好,对这两种方法都充分地阐述了各自的看法。对年代号排列法的探讨少,这主要是由于使用年代号排列同类书的图书情报部门少,没有深入进行探讨的缘故。本文拟就这三种方法进行分析比较,以此来说明年代号(按出版年月排列)较之著者号、种次号优越,是一种比较科学、实用的方法。
Over the years, the library community has been discussing methods for arranging similar books. The focus of their debate is on whether to use the good order numbers or the good ones, both of which fully expound their own views. There is little research on the method of ranking the number of chronology, which is mainly due to the fact that there are few library and intelligence agencies that use the chronological rankings of similar books and did not conduct in-depth discussions. This article intends to analyze and compare these three methods, in order to illustrate the year code (according to the publication of the year) than the author, the number is superior, is a more scientific and practical method.