论文部分内容阅读
17世纪,滏阳河流域因争夺灌溉用水而出现大量相关的诉讼案件。以曲周县为代表的下游地区能根据水环境的状况灵活调整农作物,从而成功避免卷入纠纷。作为“失利者”的永年县,为维系境内水利,先后起诉邯郸县、磁州,但终难以遏制水田亩数的缩减趋势。磁州凭借地理优势,在情理和现实中都牢牢拥着滏水的实际所有权,并以“得利者”的态势赢得了与下游的官司。地方志不仅给我们留下了这些案件的来龙去脉,也传递出当时特定利益群体的意志和主张,而这又使地方志本身也不自觉地扮演了水利纠纷中的一个生动角色。
In the 17th century, a large number of litigation cases occurred in the Suiyang River Basin for fighting for irrigation water. The downstream area represented by Quzhou County can flexibly adjust the crops according to the conditions of the water environment so as to avoid being involved in disputes. Yongnian County, as the “loser”, has sued Handan County and Cizhou for the purpose of maintaining the territory’s water conservancy. However, it is hard to curb the shrinking trend of paddy fields. Cizhou by virtue of geographical advantages, in both the truth and reality are firmly hold the actual ownership of the water, and to “profiteer ” situation won the lawsuit with the downstream. Local chronicles not only left us the ins and outs of these cases, but also conveyed the will and proposition of the specific interest groups at that time, which in turn caused the local chronicles themselves unconsciously to play a vivid role in water disputes.