论文部分内容阅读
左右其实是十分明确的概念,那是指方位而言,右不会变左,在左右不了。当然以一个定位为标的,如靠左走,转个身就变成靠右了。但一搭上政治就使人糊涂,有时甚至是个模糊概念了。不知何以为根据,左是属于进步的、革命的;右则是保守的,反动的。因此长久以来,人们为了明哲保身,宁“左”勿右,越“左”越够味。不“左”也装出个“左”样来。世上的事是无巧不成书的。恰巧中国封建帝皇朝南坐,以至尊定位,则西为右,东为左。不知道是否出自这个传统观念:受了西风薰陶就不免右;反之,东风吹,红旗飘:西方反动东方红。这似乎是笑话,却是一点不假,我自己就为此弄得昏头转向。往往一件事,从这个角度看是右,换个角度便大不然。缘此我有过一个自己也说不清楚的想法:对政治上幼稚的人说来,
In fact, the concept is very clear, which means that the right, the right will not change left, left or right. Of course, a positioning as the standard, such as left to go, turn around and become the right. However, getting rid of politics is confused and sometimes even vague. I do not know why it is based on the left is a progressive, revolutionary; the right is conservative and reactionary. So for a long time, people in order to protect themselves, rather “left ” not the right, the more “left ” the more flavor enough. No “left ” also pretend to be a “left ” kind to. The world is reckless. It happens that the Chinese feudal emperor sat south, to the supreme positioning, the west is right, east to left. Do not know whether it is from this traditional concept: the West can not help but suffer from the right; the other hand, the East wind blowing, red flag floating: the Western reactionary red. This seems to be a joke, but it is not a fake, I myself made for this fainted. Often one thing, from this perspective is the right, from another perspective is not the case. For this reason I have had an idea that I myself can not understand: for the politically naive people,