论文部分内容阅读
针对近年来国外偏头痛临床研究领域中出现的“针刺与伪针刺疗效无差异”这一结论,通过对伪针刺(安慰针刺)的定义和理想的安慰针刺需遵循的原则,浅刺的定义、部位、作用及临床效果几方面的论述,探讨浅刺能否作为针刺临床研究中的伪针刺(安慰针刺)对照方法.结果表明“用最小刺激量针刺皮肤表浅层经穴或非经穴”这种所谓的“伪针刺(安慰针刺)”对照方法,很可能是通过“浅刺皮部”这一途径激发了人体全身性的调整作用,从而发挥了治疗作用.故该法并非适宜的安慰针刺对照方法,不能作为针刺临床研究中的伪针刺(安慰针刺)对照方法,因此自然可以推翻用该法作为安慰针刺对照方法得出的“针刺与伪针刺的疗效无差异”这一结论.“,”Aiming at the conclusion that “there is no difference in efficacy between acupuncture and sham-acupuncture” in clinical research field of migraine in foreign countries in recent years,through the discussions on the definition of sham acupuncture(placebo acupuncture),the principles required to be obey in satisfactory placebo acupuncture,the definition,location,function as well as clinical results of shallow puncture,the authors probed into whether shallow puncture could be the control method of sham acupuncture(placebo acupuncture) in clinical research of acupuncture.It was demonstrated in the results that “acupuncture with minimal stimulation on skin superficial layer of meridian points or non-meridian points”,the so-called control method of “sham acupuncture(placebo acupuncture)” excited holistic re-gulation of human body quite probably through “shallow puncture on cutaneous region of meridians” to achieve therapeutic effects.Hence,this method is not the appropriate control method of placebo acupuncture and cannot be the control method of sham acupuncture(placebo acupuncture) in clinical research of acupuncture.Therefore,it is naturally to repudiate the conclusion that “there is no difference in efficacy between acupuncture and sham acupuncture” in the research where this method is taken as the control of placebo acupuncture.