论文部分内容阅读
一、建构统一的侵权法理论基础之必要性侵权法为什么要强迫某人向受害人承担损害赔偿(或补偿)责任?在合理解释这个事关侵权法根本的问题时,必然要涉及强迫该人承担该责任的正当性问题。因为“任何试图以理性的术语解释某种事物的人,除了关注该事物的正当性之外,别无它途。”〔1〕而在论证侵权法正当性的时候,侵权法学者之间存在功利论和矫正正义论两个
I. The Necessity of Constructing a Unified Theoretical Basis of Tort Law Why does tort law obligate a person to bear the responsibility of damages (or compensation) to the victim? When it is necessary to reasonably explain this issue that concerns the fundamental issue of tort law, it is bound to involve forcing the person To assume the responsibility of the legitimate issues. Because “anyone who tries to explain something in rational terms has no alternative but to consider the legitimacy of the thing.” [1] In arguing the justification of tort law, however, tort law scholars There are two utilitarian and orthodox theories of justice