论文部分内容阅读
卢梭写完《忏悔录》后 ,在朋友的小圈子里朗读了其中的第二部 ,希望朋友们就他的性格和内心展开讨论 ,纠正自己被歪曲的形象 ,但是他的朗读遭到的竟是一阵难堪的沉默。于是卢梭重新拿起笔 ,写下了另一部自辩性自传作品《对话录》。在《对话录》中 ,卢梭一反传统的自传叙事模式 ,采用对话刻画自己。沉默是贯穿作品始终的一个主题 ,迫害者们的沉默是强加给让_雅克的一种惩罚 ,让_雅克的沉默是被剥夺了说话权利的结果 ,是一种无奈。卢梭之所以采用对话形式 ,就是迫使对立的双方把话说出来。在作品内部 ,卢梭打破了沉默 ,但这种胜利只是纸上的胜利 ,卢梭渴望在现实中找到一位知心读者 ,于是他执着地踏上了寻找可靠的手稿寄托者之路 ,但每次均以沉默告终 ,卢梭在沉默中一步步走向孤独
Rousseau finished “Confessions”, after reading the second part of her circle of friends, I hope my friends will start discussions on his character and heart to correct his distorted image. However, It was an embarrassing silence So Rousseau pick up the pen again, wrote another autobiographical autobiography “dialogue.” In Dialogues, Rousseau refrains from traditional narrative patterns of autobiography and uses dialogue to portray himself. Silence is a theme that runs through the works. The silence of the persecutors is a punishment imposed on Jean-Jacques, so that _ Jacques’ silence is the result of denial of the right to speak and is a helplessness. The reason why Rousseau adopts the form of dialogue is to force opponents to speak out. Within the work, Rousseau broke the silence, but this victory was only a victory on paper. Rousseau longs for finding a well-informed reader in reality, and he clings to the search for reliable manuscripts, but each time Silence ended, Rousseau step by step in silence to loneliness