论文部分内容阅读
[主持人的话] 本期辩题的核心是善与恶的关系问题。正方实际上是主张积小善以成大善,因而对小偷的行为采取宽容的态度,认为“对于他们的点滴进步”,“都应该给予肯定”。而反方则认为善恶不两立,尽管小偷做了点好事,但他与此同时却在继续伤害其他人,犯下了新的罪恶,因而不能鼓励。两种观点确实都有道理,可惜的是,双方对自己的观点表达得都不够充分。其实正方可以从人性的复杂性上做些文章。每个人心中都是善与恶、天使与魔鬼交战的战场,关键在于哪一方占了上风。从这个意义上讲,小偷的行为确实是对“旧我”的超越。反方也可以更加旗帜鲜明地亮出嫉恶如仇的立场,指出小偷所做的好事并不能掩盖他的罪行,如不悬崖勒马,迟早会受到法律的严惩。为了把道理讲得更充分,更有力,还可以补充一些相关的事例。比如说,正方就可以举出身边一些同学逐渐进步的事例。“事实胜于雄辩”嘛。当然,这就需要平时多读书,多积累。这样,我们才能“所向无敌”。陶燕茹同学发挥得更好一些,本期最佳辩手应该是她。
[Chairman’s words] The core of this issue is the relationship between good and evil. Actually, Fangzheng advocates accumulating small things to be good and good, and thus adopts a tolerant attitude toward the behavior of thieves. He believes that “for them to improve,” “should be affirmed.” The opposite party believes that good and evil do not stand together. Although the thief has done a good job, he has continued to hurt others and has committed new crimes and cannot be encouraged. The two views do indeed make sense. Unfortunately, both sides have not expressed enough their own views. In fact, we can do some articles on the complexity of human nature. Everyone’s heart is a battlefield where good and evil and angels and devils are at war. The key lies in which side has the upper hand. In this sense, the thief’s behavior is indeed beyond the “old me.” The opposing party can also display a hateful position more clearly and clearly. It points out that the good things the thief has done can not cover up his crimes. If it does not happen, it will sooner or later be severely punished by law. In order to speak more fully and more powerfully, some relevant examples can also be added. For example, the positive side can give some examples of the progressive progress of the students around them. “Facts speak louder than words”. Of course, this requires more reading and more accumulation in peacetime. In this way, we can be “invincible.” Tao Yanru’s classmates are playing better. The best debater in this period should be her.