论文部分内容阅读
吕思勉先生与钱穆先生分别于20世纪20年代和40年代出版了他们在中国通史方面的代表性著作《白话本国史》与《国史大纲》。《白话本国史》写作于国家局势略微好转、新文化运动大盛之际,其中所反映的历史教育思想以平实为主。《国史大纲》写作于日寇侵逼、民族主义高涨之时,其中所反映的历史教育思想以情感为主。虽然两书中的历史教育思想迥然不同,但是他们顺着说中国史的历史教育思想却前后一致,未曾大变。从《白话本国史》到《国史大纲》,正反映了那个大时代下国家安危与史学教育的相互激荡,同时也反映了激荡中史家教育思想的独立之道。
Mr. Lv Siming and Mr. Qian Mu published their representative works “Vernacular History” and “National History Outline” respectively in the 1920s and 1940s. On the occasion of the slight improvement of the national situation and the flourishing of the New Culture Movement, the writing of “vernacular national history” is mainly based on the level of historical education reflected in it. When the “Outline of National History” was written by Japanese invaders and nationalism was on the rise, the historical education thoughts reflected in it mainly focused on emotion. Although the two schools of thought have a very different history education philosophy, they have consistently followed the principle of history education in Chinese history and have not changed much from the past. From “vernacular national history” to “outline of national history”, it reflects the mutual turbulence between national security and history education in that big era, and also reflects the independent way to stir up the historian education thought.