论文部分内容阅读
索恩-雷特尔提出,必须在哲学认识论的层面真正深化历史唯物主义,推进马克思在经济学研究中已经提出但没有根本解决的问题,即康德认识论革命的历史唯物主义答案——商品形式与意识形式的关系问题。并且,这一归基关系特别是“拜物教化的整个机制”甚至可以延伸到整个文化史,康德认识论中放大的观念本质构成的先天图式和它所统摄的现象世界(事实性),都是一定历史条件下不平等社会剥削关系下的劳动实践的拜物教化异在,看起来独立的思维结构只是中介化的功能社会化的结果。
Thorn-Reiter proposed that it is necessary to truly deepen historical materialism at the level of philosophical epistemology and promote the issues that Marx has proposed in the study of economics but have not yet solved it at all. That is to say, the historical materialist answers to Kant’s epistemological revolution - The relationship between the ideological issues. Moreover, the home-based relationship, especially “the whole mechanism of fetishism,” can even extend to the innate schemata formed by the magnified concept essence of the entire cultural history and Kant’s epistemology and the phenomenal world (factual) Are all fetishistic differences in labor practices under the unequal social exploitation under certain historical conditions. It seems that the independent thinking structure is only the result of the functional socialization of intermediaries.