论文部分内容阅读
我省经过30多年以食用碘盐为主的综合防治措施,已有相当数量县(市、区)的儿童甲肿率已达到或接近消除指标。但对县(市、区)如何进行抽样考核,目前看法尚未一致,有的认为应以国际组织推出的PPS监测方法进行考核,有的提出可以采取两种简便的抽样方法考核。为比较三种抽样方法考核儿童甲肿率的结果是否相同,作者于1997年6～10月在3个县(市)进行了对比观察,结果报道如下。1 材料与方法1.1 抽样地点与对象1.1.1 被抽考县(市)情况 大洼县:该县原划为非
After more than 30 years in our province to eat iodized salt-based comprehensive prevention and control measures, a considerable number of counties (cities, districts) of children with bruising rate has reached or near elimination indicators. However, there is still no consensus on how to carry out sampling tests in counties (cities and districts). Some people think that PPS monitoring methods introduced by international organizations should be used for assessment. Some suggest that two simple sampling methods can be adopted. In order to compare the results of the three sampling methods in assessing children’s pituitary rate, the author conducted a comparative observation in 3 counties (cities) from June to October 1997, and the results are reported as follows. 1 Materials and methods 1.1 sampling sites and objects 1.1.1 was sampled counties (cities) situation Dawa County: the county was originally designated as non-