论文部分内容阅读
本文拟就吕骥先生于《中央音乐学院学报》1989年第二、三期发表的《(乐记)整理本注译》(以下简称《注译》)提出愚见,与之商略(为行文方便计,也为便于读者查阅对照,本商略即按《注译》各部分先后次序进行,页码以《学报》为准)。 一、关于《说明》 (一)《注译》说,原书“《乐论》并未集中论乐,《乐礼》也未集中论礼。两篇都是乐与礼并论。我的整理本倒是把关于礼仪的某些句段,从《乐论》、《乐施》等篇中调整进去,把礼仪的内容集中了,加强了,论礼仪的主题更鲜
This article intends to Mr. Lü Ji in the “Central Conservatory of Music,” 1989 second and third issue of “(Note) finishing Annotation” (hereinafter referred to as “Annotation”) put forward my humble opinion, and the business strategy for Convenient for the text, but also for the convenience of readers access to the control, the business slightly according to “note translation” the order of the various parts of the page to “Journal”). First, the “explanation” (a) “Annotation translation” that the original book “music theory” is not focused on music, “music” did not focus on etiquette. Tidying up some of the sections on etiquette, from the “music theory”, “Oxfam” and other articles to adjust into the contents of the etiquette to focus and strengthen the etiquette theme more fresh