论文部分内容阅读
目的对照分析单纯微波治疗与氧化剂冲洗联合微波治疗在宫颈糜烂合并人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)阳性患者的疗效。方法 100例宫颈糜烂合并HIV阳性患者,随机分为对照组和观察组,每组50例。对照组给予单纯微波治疗,观察组给予氧化剂联合微波治疗,通过疗效分析及症状的改善来评估两种治疗手段的临床价值。结果治疗后症状改善情况:1腰酸腹坠痛:观察组症状改善率90%(45/50),对照组为80%(40/50)。两组患者症状改善率间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。疗效比较:观察组治愈率、显效率、有效率及总有效率分别为54%、20%、24%、98%,对照组分比为36%、18%、34%、94%,两组无效率分别为2%、12%。两组患者治愈率及总有效率间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论微波治疗操作简便、安全性高、手术时间短,术中及术后患者无痛苦及出血,无组织烧焦雾气,愈合时间短,能恢复正常宫颈柔软的质地和外型且无瘢痕,联合氧化剂治疗改善HIV阳性患者的宫颈糜烂,值得临床上推广使用。
Objective To analyze the curative effect of microwave therapy combined with oxidant flushing and microwave therapy on patients with cervical erosion and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive patients. Methods 100 cases of cervical erosion combined with HIV-positive patients were randomly divided into control group and observation group, 50 cases in each group. The control group received simple microwave treatment. The observation group was given oxidant combined with microwave treatment. The clinical value of the two treatment methods was evaluated by analysis of curative effect and improvement of symptoms. Results After treatment, the symptom improvement was as follows: 1 case of abdominal pain in abdominal pain: 90% (45/50) in observation group and 80% (40/50) in control group. There was significant difference between the two groups in symptom improvement (P <0.05). The curative effect of the observation group was 54%, 20%, 24%, 98%, 36%, 18%, 34%, 94% The inefficiencies were 2% and 12% respectively. There was significant difference between the two groups in cure rate and total effective rate (P <0.05). Conclusion Microwave treatment is simple, safe, short operative time, intraoperative and postoperative patients with no pain and bleeding, burned without tissue mist, healing time is short, can restore the normal cervical soft texture and appearance without scarring, joint Oxidant treatment to improve cervical erosion in HIV-positive patients, it is worth promoting the clinical use.