论文部分内容阅读
AIM: To evaluate the benefit and safety of sivelestat(a neutrophil elastase inhibitor) administration in patients undergoing esophagectomy. METHODS: Online databases including Pub Med, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Web of Knowledge, and Chinese databases(Wanfang database, VIP and CNKI) were searched systematically up to November 2013. Randomized controlled trials and high-qualitycomparative studies were considered eligible for inclusion. Three reviewers evaluated the methodological quality of the included studies, and Stata 12.0 software was used to analyze the extracted data. The risk ratio(RR) was used to express the effect size of dichotomous outcomes, and mean difference(MD) or standardized mean difference was used to express the effect size of continuous outcomes.RESULTS: Thirteen studies were included in this systematic review and nine studies were included in the meta-analysis. The duration of mechanical ventilation was significantly decreased in the sivelestat group on postoperative day 5 [I2 = 76.3%, SMD =-1.41, 95%CI:-2.63-(-0.19)]. Sivelestat greatly lowered the incidence of acute lung injury in patients after surgery(I2 = 0%, RR = 0.27, 95%CI: 0.08-0.93). However, it did not decrease the incidence of pneumonia, intensive care unit stay or postoperative hospital stay, and did not increase the incidence of complications such as anastomotic leakage, recurrent nerve palsy, wound infection, sepsis and catheter-related fever. CONCLUSION: A neutrophil elastase inhibitor is beneficial in patients undergoing esophagectomy. More high quality, large sample, multi-center and randomized controlled trials are needed to validate this effect.
METHODS: Online databases including Pub Med, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Web of Knowledge, and Chinese databases (Wanfang database, VIP and CNKI ) was searched systematically up to November 2013. Randomized controlled trials and high-quality consensus studies were considered eligible for inclusion. Three reviewers evaluated the methodological quality of the included studies, and Stata 12.0 software was used to analyze the extracted data. The risk ratio ( RR) was used to express the effect size of dichotomous outcomes, and mean difference (MD) or standardized mean difference was used to express the effect size of continuous resultss.RESULTS: Thirteen studies were included in this systematic review and nine studies were included in the meta-analysis. The duration of mechanical ventilation was significantly less in the sivelestat group on postoper Sivelestat substantially lowered the incidence of acute lung injury in patients after surgery (I2 = 0%, RR = 0.27, 95% CI: -2.63 - (- 0.19) 95% CI: 0.08-0.93). However, it did not decrease the incidence of pneumonia, intensive care unit stay or postoperative hospital stay, and did not increase the incidence of complications such as anastomotic leakage, recurrent nerve palsy, wound infection, sepsis and catheter-related fever. CONCLUSION: A neutrophil elastase inhibitor is beneficial in patients undergoing esophagectomy. More high quality, large sample, multi-center and randomized controlled trials are needed to validate this effect.