论文部分内容阅读
通过１７个试验地模拟各种形式的造林，对两种方法进行充分对比证明．大面积造林和林间０．５ｈｍ￣２左右小面积造林采用方法Ⅰ较好。而在林内小块造林或郁闭度０．３以下的疏林下造林采用方法Ⅱ更好。
Seventeen experiments were used to simulate various forms of afforestation and the two methods were fully compared and proved. Large afforestation and afforestation 0.5hm ~ 2 small area afforestation method I is better. In the forest afforestation or canopy density less than 0.3 below the sparse forest afforestation method II is better.