论文部分内容阅读
(一) 分级立卷还是以问题为主立卷?目前立卷问题讨论会正在热烈地争论着。主张分级立卷的人,认为不分级、打乱级别、以问题为主混合立卷的缺点很多:第一是破坏了文件的自然形成规律,分割了文件之间的有机联系;第二是破坏了各级组织的工作活动的面貌,割断了一级组织在工作中形成的文件之间最密切的联系;第三是产生档案玉石不分的现象,使鉴定工作增加许多困难;第四是不便于查找,影响了对档案的利用;第五是不便于保密,不便于维护档案的安全。不赞成分级的人,认为以问题为主,结合其它特征立卷有许多好
(A) grading or volume-based curl problem-based curly up? The current volume of the seminar is being heated debate. Those who advocate the grading of the volume, think there are many shortcomings of non-graded, disruptive levels and the problem-based blending. The first is to ruin the natural formation of the documents and divide the organic links between the documents. The second is to destroy The appearance of the work activities at all levels of organization and the clearest connection between the documents formed by the first-level organizations at work; the third is the unequal distribution of files and jades, which adds many difficulties to the identification work; the fourth is not Easy to find, affecting the use of the file; the fifth is not easy to keep secret, not easy to maintain the safety of the file. People who are not in favor of grading think that they are mainly problem-based, and that there are many good works in combination with other characteristics