论文部分内容阅读
美国新批评家克林思·布鲁克斯与俄国形式主义者尤里·特尼亚诺夫都认为诗歌是有机统一体,诗歌中存在两种相对立的运动,诗歌的统一是动态的,诗歌语言是非传统化的,都具有循环的传统观,趋向结构主义。两人理论的根本性不同在于各自的语言观。布鲁克斯认为语言是孤立在历史之外的,是一个封闭的系统;语言与世界是隔离的;诗歌语言与科学语言二分;词语二分为内涵与外延;解释诗歌时以情境为参考框架;重语义分析。而特尼亚诺夫认为语言天生具有历史属性,与历史是统一的;语言与外在世界统一;诗歌语言与科学语言统一;词语统一在其主要属性与次级属性中;解释诗歌的参考框架以语言的逻辑为主;诗歌分析重在其韵律与节奏。
Both the new American critic Kelly Brooks and the Russian formalist Yury Turanov think that poetry is an organic unity. There are two opposing movements in poetry. The unity of poetry is dynamic and the language of poetry is non-existent Traditional, have a traditional view of the cycle, tend to structuralism. The fundamental difference between the two theories lies in their own language view. Brooks holds that language is isolated from history and is a closed system; that language is isolated from the world; that poetry is dichotomized from science; that words are divided into connotation and denotation; that contexts are used when interpreting poetry; and that heavy semantic analysis . Tehnianov holds that language is inherently historical in nature, unification with history, unity of language and external world, unity of poetic language and scientific language, unity of words in its major and subordinate attributes, reference frame of interpretation of poetry Mainly in the logic of language; poetry analysis focuses on its rhythm and rhythm.