论文部分内容阅读
本文通过厘清美国辩诉交易法律与经济两个方面的价值,认为该机制为了追求刑事效率,破坏了当代刑事证据证明标准和审判制度。德国作为刑事职权主义代表,其对于美国辩诉交易进行了部分修正,在坚持审判中心主义的同时,充分尊重检察官与被告达成的辩诉协议。结合以上经验,笔者认为当代刑事纠纷快速解决机制的构建才是刑事法所欲实现的目标,辩诉交易只是实现这一目标的途径之一。我国当事人和解的公诉案件诉讼程序便具备法律与经济两个方面的价值,进而提出了两种改善方式:(1)拓宽和解范围;(2)在不拓展现有和解范围的前提下,规定法院只作出程序性而非实质审查。
By clarifying the value of both the law and the economy of the U.S. plea bargaining, this paper argues that this mechanism has destroyed the standards and trial system of contemporary criminal evidence in order to pursue criminal efficiency. Germany, as a representative of criminal authority, partially amended the U.S. plea bargaining while adhering to trial-centrism and fully respected the plea agreement reached between the prosecutor and the defendant. Combined with the above experience, I believe that the construction of a rapid solution to the contemporary criminal disputes is the goal of criminal law, plea bargaining is only one way to achieve this goal. (2) Without prejudice to the scope of the existing reconciliation, the court is required to provide for the improvement of the scope of reconciliation; (2) Only procedural rather than substantive examination is to be made.