论文部分内容阅读
无意思联络数人侵权责任认定中的“直接结合”与“间接结合”标准为司法实践带来诸多困难,需要司法者根据具体案情加以把握。本文借鉴域外法律经验,针对我国司法实践,认为区分“直接结合”与“间接结合”可以从损害后果的同一性、侵权行为发生时间的同时性、因果关系诸要素加以考虑,并对司法实践中“不作为”侵权及“按份判决”问题加以分析,以有益于我国的司法裁判。
The “direct combination” and “indirect combination” standards in the identification of unintentional infringement rights in a number of persons bring many difficulties to judicial practice and require the judicial personnel to grasp it according to the specific circumstances. This paper draws on the experience of extraterritorial legal services and considers that the distinction between “direct combination” and “indirect combination” can be taken into consideration from the identity of the consequence of damage, the simultaneity of the time of infringement, and Analyze the issue of “non-action” infringement and “judgment by case” in judicial practice in order to benefit our judiciary.