论文部分内容阅读
怎样才能正确评价历史事件、人物和观点,不被一些历史表象所迷惑。怎样运用辩证唯物主义和历史唯物主义,对静态的历史史实,进行动态的分析、提炼。我认为,必须把历史事件和人物,把历史事实和历史观点放到较为宽阔的历史时空和历史背景中加以考察,才能得出正确的结论,也才能较好地回答历史问答题,下面举三例说明之: 例一,问:列宁说:巴黎公社之后到1905年俄国革命之前的这一时期“带有和平性质而没有发生过革命”。试以史实说明这一时期工人运动的特点。它与19世纪前半期工人运动有何不同?为什么会出现这种现象?结束这一“和平”局面的革命为什么首先发生在俄国?
How can we correctly evaluate historical events, people, and viewpoints and are not confused by some historical appearances. How to use dialectical materialism and historical materialism to dynamically analyze and refine static historical facts. In my opinion, historical events and people must put historical facts and historical viewpoints into a relatively wide historical space, time, and historical background to examine them in order to draw correct conclusions and to answer well-answered questions in history. Examples: Case 1, Lenin said: After the Paris Commune until 1905, this period before the Russian revolution “had a peaceful nature without a revolution.” Try to use historical facts to explain the characteristics of the workers’ movement during this period. How is it different from the labor movement in the first half of the 19th century and why does it happen? Why did the revolution that ended this “peaceful” situation occur first in Russia?