长江口洪季水动力对海平面上升的响应特征

来源 :水动力学研究与进展(A辑) | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:chad
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
考虑到海平面上升对长江口水动力构成的严重威胁,该文基于MIKE21软件建立了长江口二维水动力数学模型,采用实测潮位、流速以及流向资料对模型进行了验证。对相关文献和IPCC报告进行总结归纳,得到2100年海平面保守上升值约为0.5 m。运用验证好的数学模型对海平面上升0.5 m后长江口洪季水动力进行了数值模拟。计算结果表明:海平面上升后,涨潮时间增长,落潮时间缩短;海平面上升0.5 m后,长江口南北支、南北港以及南北槽高潮位增加了0.43 m–0.46 m,高潮位增幅沿程向上减小,北支上段涨潮动力受阻较明显(潮位增幅较大);海平面上升0.5 m后,北支流速增幅比南支大,北支上段落潮流量增幅达82.8%,对北支水道的发展有利。总体而言,海平面上升对目前长江口沿岸的标准构成了一定威胁,但对已经衰退的北支水道有利。 Taking into account the sea level rise posed a serious threat to the hydrodynamics of the Yangtze River estuary, a two-dimensional hydrodynamic model of the Yangtze Estuary was established based on MIKE21 software. The model was verified by the measured tide level, velocity and direction data. Summarizing relevant literature and the IPCC report, the conservative increase of the sea level in 2100 is estimated to be about 0.5 m. The mathematical model of the Yangtze River Estuary flood is used to simulate the flood season hydrodynamics after the sea level rises by 0.5 m with the verified mathematical model. The results show that after the sea level rises, the tide time increases and the tide time shortens. After the sea level rises 0.5 m, the tidal range at the north, south, north and south troughs and the north-south trough increases 0.43 m-0.46 m, After the sea level rises 0.5 m, the north branch velocity increase is larger than that of the south branch, and the tidal flow increase of the upper part of the north branch reaches 82.8%. The velocity of the north branch water channel Development is favorable. Overall, rising sea levels pose a threat to the current standards along the Yangtze Estuary, but are favorable to the already-decimated North Branch channel.
其他文献
目前社会越来越关注学生的心理健康问题,中职学校应该提高对心理健康教育的重视度,通过构建医教结合模式,弥补学校健康教育师资的不足.医教结合模式应用于中职心理健康教育工
请下载后查看,本文暂不支持在线获取查看简介。 Please download to view, this article does not support online access to view profile.
期刊
虽然高职院校的教师队伍建设在不断完善,但是与新时代国家职业教育改革的新要求相比,高职院校教师队伍还存在着数量不足、来源单一、校企双向流动不畅、结构性矛盾突出、管理