论文部分内容阅读
纠正裁判错误与吸纳不满是审级制度的核心功能。本文通过分析全国法院从2003年至2008年的相关数据,指出现行两审终审制纠错功能有限,民众对诉讼的依赖强烈又充斥不满,进而借鉴理性人假设,通过审级效益概念分析相关主体运用审级制度的成本收益,指出现行制度的不足及其改良的条件,并主张建立科学合理的混合型审级制度。
Correct the errors of referees and absorb the dissatisfaction are the core functions of the trial level system. This paper analyzes the relevant data from 2003 to 2008 of the national courts and points out that the current two-trial court system has a limited error-correcting function and people are strongly and dissatisfied with the lawsuit. Based on the hypothesis of rational persons, Using the cost-benefit of the trial-level system, this paper points out the shortcomings of the current system and the conditions for its improvement, and advocates the establishment of a scientific and reasonable mixed-type trial system.