论文部分内容阅读
Ⅰ前言自从山田孝雄博士提出“陈述”概念以来,围绕陈述问题的争论已经延续了几十年。战前参加争论的有:时枝诚记、三宅武郎、三尾砂等学者;战后又有大岩正仲、佐藤喜代治、大野晋、永野贤、福田良辅、大久保忠利以及金田一春彦等学者参加了讨论。这样把战前的研究推进了更高的阶段。后来渡边博士提出了他自己独特的陈述理论之后,对陈述的研究更加深入了。于是芳贺绥、桑田明等学者开始把前人的观点加以整理,并提出各自的观点。但是,也应当指山,陈述问题至今还没有统一的看法。正如服部四郎所指出的那样,“陈述是个
I. Introduction Since the concept of “statement” was proposed by Dr. Yamada Takasaki, the controversy surrounding the statement has been going on for decades. Participants in the debate before the war include: Shichiku Keiji, Miyake Wushu, three tailings sand and other scholars; after the war and Oishiwa Chung, Sato Kiyoji, Ohno Jin, Yong Ye Xian, Fukuda Liang Fu, Okubo Zhongri and Kindaichi Chunyan and other scholars attended discuss. This pushed pre-war research to a higher stage. After Dr. Watanabe put forward his own unique theory of presentation, the research on the statement was further deepened. As a result, scholars such as Fong He Sui and Kuwataki began to put forward the viewpoint of their predecessors and put forward their own views. However, it should also refer to the mountain. As yet, there is no unified view on the stated issues. As Shibu Shiro said: "The statement is one