论文部分内容阅读
1980年,G·巴尔尼的《致总统的关于2000年世界的报告:进入二十一世纪》一书在美国问世,书中对世界未来的发展所持的悲观论调,对美国和其它资本主义大国产生了广泛的影响。对此,美国学者Г·凯恩和ДЖ·西蒙感到十分愤慨,并组织一批颇有声望的学者,编撰了一本《富饶的星球<对2000年的世界>的回答》,以大量例证对《报告》的悲观论调进行了批驳。苏联学者M·比良耶夫在《世界经济与国防关系》杂志1985年9月号上发表了一则题为《地球的资源:关于最近的将来的两种论点》的书评,介绍了《报告》和《回答》中主要的对立论点,充分肯定了《回答》的批驳,同时也指出了《回答》同避政治问题的缺点。现将书评译出刊载于后,供读者参考。
In 1980, G. Barney's book “The President's Report on the World 2000: Entering the Twenty-first Century” was published in the United States. The book's pessimistic view on the future development of the world is of great significance to the United States and other capitalist powers Has a wide range of effects. In response, American scholar Γ Kane and ДЖ Simon were very indignant and organized a group of reputable scholars to compile a book entitled “The Rich Planet”, Answering the World of 2000, with plenty of examples The pessimistic tone of the report has been criticized. In a September 1985 issue of The World Association for Economic Relations and Defense, Soviet scholar M. Bitayev published a book review titled “Resources of the Earth: Two Arguments for the Near Future,” introducing the “Report” And “answer” in the main opposition, fully affirmed the “answer” criticism, but also pointed out that the “answer” with the shortcomings of the same political issues. Book review is published in the future, for readers reference.