论文部分内容阅读
本世纪三、四十年代,思想界掀起了一股重建中国哲学的热潮,许多人都试图将他们所接受的外来学说同中国传统哲学结合起来并建构新型的系统。其中,冯友兰和金岳霖是比较著名的两位,他们分别在《新理学》和《论道》中建构了一独立的形而上学体系。但是,由于两人共同的思想背景(均接受了本世纪初流行于英美的新实在论)及大致相同的思维路向(均服膺逻辑分析法并用它来重新解释、组织和发挥中国传统哲学的概念和范畴),这两个系统通常被看作是十分近似甚至相同的。例如,贺麟在四十年代就认为:“冯友兰先生的《新理学》与金先生的《论道》,在基本概念上是相同的。冯先生所谓理,相当于金先生所谓式,冯先生所谓气,相当于金先生所谓能。由无极之气到太极之理,所谓‘无极而太极’的过程,形成‘流行’的实际事物的世界,两人的说法也是相同的。”再加上写作过程中冯金二人过从甚密,相互影响,这种说法更显得确凿无疑。如果事实真是
In the 1930s and 1940s, the world of thought set off an upsurge of rebuilding Chinese philosophy. Many people tried to combine the foreign theory they accepted with Chinese traditional philosophy and construct a new type of system. Among them, Feng Youlan and Jin Yuelin are two famous people who have constructed an independent metaphysical system in Neo-Confucianism and On Tao. However, due to their common ideological background (both accepted by the Anglo-American neo-realism at the beginning of this century) and roughly the same way of thinking (both of them were re-interpreted and used to interpret, organize and exert the concept of Chinese traditional philosophy And category), these two systems are usually considered as very similar or even the same. For example, He Lin said in the 1940s that “Mr. Feng Youlan’s Neo-Confucianism is basically the same in concept as Mr. Jin’s” On Taoism. "Mr Fung’s so-called principle is equivalent to Mr. Kim’s so-called formula. Mr. Fung The so-called qi, which is equivalent to the so-called Mr. Kim can be. From the gas to the principle of Tai Chi Chi, the so-called ’Promise and Tai Chi’ process, the formation of ’popular’ practical things in the world, the two say the same. In the process of writing, Feng Jin and his two very close, mutual influence, this argument is even more conclusive. If the truth is true