论文部分内容阅读
被追诉人阅卷权作为辩护权的必要配置、知情权的重要保障、律师阅卷权的有力补充以及自行辩护的基本要求,在我国刑事诉讼法中没有得到明确体现,司法实务中也由于传统司法理念的桎梏而处于灰色地带,争议不断。但在域外,被追诉人阅卷权已经在学界引起了热议,欧洲人权法院通过若干判例确立了该制度,并推动了德国、奥地利、日本、俄罗斯等国以及我国台湾地区对被追诉人阅卷权进行相应的程序设计。因此,应从立法层面上明确确立被追诉人享有阅卷权,并对被追诉人行使阅卷权的范围、阶段、方式、例外以及救济等进行具体的程序设计,以期对日后构建被追诉人阅卷制度提供一个可行性的实施方案。
As the necessary disposition of the right of defense, the important guarantee of the right to information, the powerful supplement of the lawyer’s right to readjustment and the basic requirement of self-defense are not clearly demonstrated in China’s Criminal Procedure Law,桎 梏 And in a gray area, controversial. However, outside the domain, the prosecutor’s right of reading has aroused heated debate in the academic community. The European Court of Human Rights has established the system through several jurisprudence and promoted the readmission of prosecutors in countries such as Germany, Austria, Japan, Russia and Taiwan in China The appropriate programming. Therefore, it is necessary to clearly establish at the legislative level that the respondent should have the right to read the book and design the scope, stages, methods, exceptions and remedies of the prosecutor’s exercise of the right to read the book with a view to providing the future system A feasible implementation plan.