论文部分内容阅读
萨伊是法国庸俗经济学的创始人,他开创了一条从另外一个角度发展斯密和李嘉图经济哲学方法的道路。这是一条把经济学从社会历史中拉出来,置放回狭义的经济学中去的道路。从哲学方法上讲,实际上就是回到了重商主义专注于商品流通领域的经济学思路上。本文从社会性、历史性两个方面把萨伊的经济哲学方法和马克思的经济哲学方法做了比较。萨伊的经验的抽象哲学方法和马克思的唯物辨证的社会历史的哲学方法形成了鲜明的对照,充分展示了马克思哲学方法的优越性。
Say, a founder of French vulgar economics, pioneered a path to develop Smith’s and Ricardo’s economic philosophy from another perspective. This is a way to pull economics out of social history and put it back into narrower economics. In philosophical terms, it is actually returning to the economic thinking of mercantilism that focuses on the field of commodity circulation. This article compares Say’s economic philosophy method and Marx’s economic philosophy method from the social and historical aspects. The abstract philosophical approach of Say’s experience and the philosophical method of Marx’s historical and social dialectical materialism form a sharp contrast and fully demonstrate the superiority of Marx’s philosophical method.