论文部分内容阅读
一九五九年中国建筑学会在上海召开“住宅标准及建筑艺术座谈会”以后,建筑界曾一度刮起了脱离政治,大谈“建筑艺术”的歪风。在这种思想的指导下,中国建筑学会又在一九六四年举办了“建筑绘面巡迴展览”。这个展览会,以所谓表现“技巧”和“艺术”为名,集中地展出了描绘“高”标准、洋框框、抽象艺术以及古典园林的亭台楼阁和小桥流水之类的货色,实质上成为宣传封建主义、资本主义思想的阵地。对此,各地曾提出过严肃的批评。这里发表唐开荣等四位同志对这个展览会的批评文章,我们认为这个批评是正确的。 “建筑绘面巡迴展览”的教训,再一次证明了在建筑领域中不突出无产阶级政治,就要突出资产阶级政治;忽视两种思想、两条道路的斗争,结果就必然要违背党的方针政策,迷失方向,走上邪路。对于这样一个坏展览,《建筑学报》曾错误地加以宣扬。这说明,我们没有用毛泽东思想挂帅,在兴无灭资的阶级斗争中丧失立场。 毛泽东同志说过:“凡是错误的思想,凡是毒草,凡是牛鬼蛇神,都应该进行批判,决不能让它们自由泛滥。”我们决心加强学习毛主席著作,突出无产阶级政治,和广大建筑工作者及读者一道,积极参加社会主义文化大革命,为捍卫毛泽东思想而战斗到底!
After the Architectural Society of China held the “Residential Standards and Architecture Art Symposium” in Shanghai in 1950, the construction industry once stirred up a disengagement from politics and talked about the hurricane of “Architecture Art.” Under the guidance of this idea, the Architectural Society of China held the “Architectural Exhibition Touring Exhibition” in 1964. This exhibition, in the name of the so-called performance “skills” and “art”, focused on exhibiting items of “high” standards, foreign frames, abstract art, and classical gardens, pavilions, bridges, and bridges. It became a position to promote feudalism and capitalism. In response to this, various localities have made serious criticisms. Here, four comrades like Tang Kairong and others criticized the exhibition. We think this criticism is correct. The lesson of the “Architectural Painting Tour Exhibition” once again proved that if the proletarian politics is not highlighted in the field of architecture, it is necessary to highlight bourgeois politics; the struggle to ignore the two ideas and the two roads will inevitably contradict the party’s policy. Policy, lost in the direction, embarked on the wrong road. For such a bad exhibition, the “Journal of Architecture” had wrongly promoted. This shows that we did not use Mao Tse-tung’s thought to dominate and lose our position in the class struggle that has not been eliminated. Comrade Mao Zedong once said: “All wrong thoughts, all poisonous weeds, and all ghosts and zombie gods should all be criticized and they must not be allowed to spread freely.” We are determined to strengthen the study of Chairman Mao’s writings, highlight proletarian politics, and the majority of construction workers and readers. Together, take an active part in the socialist cultural revolution and fight to defend Mao Tse-tung’s thought!