论文部分内容阅读
刘咸炘对四部分类体系的改造可分三部分,一是在前人的基础上,调整子目,使经、史、子、集四部收录图书更为合理;二是另立外编,专收考证书、杂记等难以归入四部的图书;三是增多类目。刘咸炘认为经过改造的四部可以包容中、西所有图书,虽然可能扰乱了西学的原有体系,但却保留了中国传统学术的固有体系。为此,刘咸炘还提出了“主客之辨”的观点,认为自己的体系要优于其他分类体系。从现代目录学的发展趋势看,刘咸炘虽然在古典目录学方面眼光卓越,但对学术发展趋势的估计显然是保守的,一如他的文化立场。
Liu Xiangyuan four types of system transformation can be divided into three parts, one is based on the predecessors, adjust the subheadings, so that by the history, sub, set four books more reasonable; second is a separate editor, Certificate, miscellaneous notes and other hard to fall into the four books; third is to increase the category. Liu believes that all four books that can be adapted to contain Chinese and Western books may have disturbed the original system of Western learning while preserving the inherent system of Chinese traditional scholarship. For this reason, Liu Xianghui also put forward the “distinction between subject and object” point of view, that their system should be superior to other classification system. Judging from the development trend of modern bibliography, although Liu saluted his vision of classical bibliography, his estimation of academic development trend was clearly conservative, just as his cultural standpoint.