论文部分内容阅读
“五四”一代学者与戊戌维新至辛亥革命时期的一代学者相比,学问气象不如前辈学者博大,思想却要激烈得多;而无论文化激进主义者还是保守主义者,态度几乎都是同样激烈,缺乏容忍不同之见、乐闻相反之论的雅量。这很值得注意并加以反思。学风总是与国运相联系,激进的新文化人标榜科学却忽视科学精神的精髓,标榜民主却缺乏梁启超那种反思法国大革命的卓识,给20世纪中国历史造成了严重的负面影响。深刻总结历史教训,有助于在新的历史条件下更加重视学风建设,正确处理传统与现代的关系,使我国的文化教育事业真正走上健康发展的道路。
Compared with a generation of scholars who had been reformed from the May Fourth Movement to the Revolution of 1911, scholars of the May Fourth Movement lacked an academic atmosphere much larger than their predecessors and their ideas were much fiercer. Almost all attitudes toward cultural activists and conservatives were The same fierce, lack of tolerance of differences, rumors contrary to the elegant. It is noteworthy and reflective. The style of study is always associated with the national transport. Radical new-culture people advertise the essence of science while ignoring the spirit of science. Posting of democracy but lacking in Liang Qichao’s re-thinking of the French Revolution have had a serious negative impact on Chinese history in the 20th century. Profoundly summarizing the lessons of history will help pay more attention to the construction of study style under the new historical conditions, and correctly handle the relationship between tradition and modernity so that our country’s cultural and educational undertaking will truly embark on the path of sound development.