论文部分内容阅读
食品安全责任惩罚性赔偿制度突破了民事责任填补性的特征,具有制裁侵权人,预防不法行为,规范市场秩序等功能。我国2015年修订的《中华人民共和国食品安全法》第148条规定被称为我国史上最严的食品安全责任惩罚性赔偿制度。但是其构成要件不够明确具体,赔偿金计算标准过于刻板,影响了实效。在维权过程中,部分消费者面对高昂的诉讼成本选择了沉默,即使进入诉讼程序,也往往因举证不能而败北。因此,在完善食品安全责任惩罚性赔偿制度的同时,还要建立配套的诉讼程序与监管机制。
The system of punitive damages for food safety responsibility breaks the feature of filling the civil liability with the functions of sanctioning the infringer, preventing wrongful acts and standardizing the market order. Article 148 of the “Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China” revised in 2015 in our country is called the most punitive compensation system for food safety responsibility in China’s history. However, its constituent elements are not clear and specific enough, and the calculation standard of compensation is too rigid and affects the actual results. In the process of safeguarding rights, some consumers choose silence in the face of high cost of litigation. Even if they enter the litigation process, they often fail because they can not prove their rights. Therefore, while perfecting the system of punitive damages for food safety responsibility, we also need to establish a supporting litigation procedure and supervision mechanism.