论文部分内容阅读
梁南同志此文,提出了一个比较新鲜的理论问题——也是一个普遍存在的创作问题:诗学逻辑。并且做了认真的阐述,颇具学术价值和实践意义。行文朴实,深入浅出,绝无诘屈聱牙之流弊。近几月来,本刊连发长文,绝非改变主张,不再倡导短文。对一些重大的理论问题和创作问题,进行深入的研究探讨,做出细致的分析论证,澄清是非,明确得失,远非短文所能胜任。因而适当发表篇幅较长的专题文章,似乎不为无益。我们仍然希望作者尽可能地把文章写得简短些、精粹些!这也是读者的要求。
Comrade Liang Nan’s article puts forward a relatively new theoretical issue - also a ubiquitous creative problem: the logic of poetics. And made a careful exposition, quite academic and practical significance. Simple and plain language, easy to understand, no merciless absurd disadvantages. In recent months, we published a long article, which in no way changed our mindset and no longer advocated short essays. On some major theoretical issues and creative issues, conduct in-depth research and discussion, make careful analysis and demonstration, clarify right and wrong, clear gains and losses, far from short essays can be competent. Therefore, proper publication of longer monographs does not seem unprofitable. We still hope that the author will try to write the article as short and concise as possible, which is the reader’s request.