论文部分内容阅读
选取某铅酸蓄电池企业,对现场进行职业卫生调查、职业病危害因素检测等,应用两种风险评估法对数据进行统计分析及评价。结果显示,ICMM健康风险评估法评估涂板、称片、包装以及焊接等接触铅及其无机化合物岗位导致铅中毒为不可容忍风险,其他岗位化学毒物风险较低;新加坡半定量风险评估法评估接触铅及其无机化合物导致铅中毒的岗位中,极高风险的有称片工、焊接工,高风险的有铸板工、涂板工、包片工和包装工,其他岗位化学毒物风险较低。两种风险评估方法各有优缺点,评价结果也有部分不同,在接触铅及其无机化合物的高风险岗位上有较强的一致性;ICMM健康风险评估法在评价铅酸蓄电池企业职业危害时更有一些优势。
Select a lead-acid battery enterprises, on-site occupational health surveys, occupational hazards and other factors, the application of two risk assessment methods for statistical analysis and evaluation of the data. The results showed that ICMM’s health risk assessment assessed the risk of intolerance of lead poisoning caused by exposure to lead, lead oxide and other inorganic compounds in the coating, sheeting, packaging and soldering, while the risk of chemical poison in other posts was lower. The semi-quantitative risk assessment method in Singapore assessed the exposure Lead and its inorganic compounds lead lead poisoning positions, there is a high risk of plaques, welding, high risk of castings, coating, wrapping and packaging workers, other positions less risk of chemical poisons . The two risk assessment methods have advantages and disadvantages, evaluation results are partly different, and there is strong consistency in exposure to high-risk positions of lead and inorganic compounds. The ICMM health risk assessment method is more effective in evaluating the occupational hazards of lead-acid battery enterprises There are some advantages.