论文部分内容阅读
目的：探讨提高血液灌流患者营养状况的护理方法，提高患者的营养状况。方法选取我院血液净化中心尿毒症病人行血液灌流患者105例将其随机分为对照组和观察组，并使其有可比性。对对照组患者实施针对血液灌流的常规护理；对观察组患者在对照组基础上进行营养干预。在患者结束治疗后(达到干体重时)测量两组患者的臂围、BMI，并通过实验室检查测定两组患者ALB、PA、Hb、TLC水平。结果经过干预，观察组患者AC、AMC、BMI、ALB、PA、Hb、TLC分别为（27.54±2.04） cm 、（24.13±1.89）cm 、（23.78±2.03）kg/m2、（38.25±2.11） g/L、（227.73±19.36）mg/L、（116.16±4.58）g/L和（16.28±0.36）×108/L，明显高于对照组，上述比较两组差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05），且经过营养干预观察组患者的并发症明显低于对照组，两组比较差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论对行血液灌流治疗的患者，通过营养干预护理可以有效改善患者的营养状况，从而减少并发症发生。“,”Objective To evaluate the nutritional status of hemoperfusion improve patient care methods to improve the nutritional status of patients.Methods 105 cases of blood perfusion in patients were randomly divided into a control group and the observation group, and make it comparable. Implementation of routine care of patients in the control group for blood perfusion; to observe patients for nutritional intervention in the control group basis. Measured at the end of treatment the patient groups were arm circumference, BMI, and by laboratory measurement ALB, PA, Hb, TLC levels of two groups of patients.Results After the intervention, the patients in the observation group AC, AMC, BMI, ALB, PA, Hb, TLC, respectively (27.54±2.04)cm, (24.13±1.89)cm, (23.78±2.03)kg/m2, (38.25±2.11)g/L, (227.73 ±19.36)mg/L, (116.16±4.58) g/L and (16.28±0.36)×108/L, significantly higher than the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusions Patients treated rows hemoperfusion through nutritional interventions can effectively improve the nutritional care of the patient, in order to reduce complications and lay a good foundation.