论文部分内容阅读
目的 通过对３８０例烧伤病人设定项目的临床观察，其中２００例创面用本科经验方（烧伤方）外涂治疗，１８０例创面用京万红软膏外涂对照治疗，临床观察项目进行对比研究，为烧伤病人寻求新的更有效疗法，进而研究烧伤方促进烧伤伤创面愈合的机理．方法 ３８０例烧伤患者被随机分为实验组和对照组，实验组创面用烧伤方煎液外涂，对照组创面用京万红软膏外涂，两组病人除创面用药不同外，其它治疗方法相同．治疗期间观察烧伤创面成痂时间、创面愈合时间、用药后创面感染情况、创面修复情况及药物的副作用以判断疗效结果 实验组治愈率为９８％，对照组治愈率为７１．７％，经统计学处理，两组间治愈率的差别有非常显著意义（ｕ＞２．５８，Ｐ＜０．０１）．结论烧伤方治疗轻、中、重度烧伤的疗效较京万红软膏显著．通过临床研究，我们认为本方具有使烧伤创面减少渗液、成痂快、抗感染能力强、创面修复好、无明显毒副作用等优点，从而缩短疗程．
Objective To provide clinical observations of 380 cases of burn patients, 200 of them were treated with undergraduate experience (burns), 180 of wounds were treated with Jingwanhong ointment, and clinical observation items were compared. For the burn patients to seek new and more effective therapy, and then study the mechanism of burns to promote burn wound healing mechanism. Methods 380 cases of burn patients were randomly divided into experimental group and control group. The wounds of experimental group were treated with decoction of burned side, and the wounds of control group were coated with Jingwanhong ointment. The two groups of patients had the same treatment except that the wound was used differently. . During the treatment period, the time of blemish formation, wound healing time, wound infection, wound repair and drug side effects were observed to judge the curative effect. The cure rate was 98% in the experimental group and 71.7% in the control group. The difference in the cure rate between the two groups was very significant (u>2.58, P<0.01). 2. Conclusion Burning has a significant effect on the treatment of mild, moderate and severe burns than Jingwanhong ointment. Through clinical research, we believe that this party has the advantages of reducing burn wounds to exudate, fasting, strong anti-infective ability, good wound repair, no obvious side effects, etc., thereby shortening the course of treatment.