论文部分内容阅读
本文以1931年至1932年为研究时段(南京国民政府对日本侵略军采取“不抵抗”政策时期),以现存1931年10月至1932年4月问出版的《实报》原件为资料,对该报头版刊登的134篇论说文章的主要观点进行归纳与梳理,以期把握该报此时期的基本立场与论调变化。同时参照新闻传播学界及历史学界的相关研究,比较《实报》与同时期平、津其他报纸观点的异同,以便对该报的论调特征,以及同时期平津报界言论的共性获得更准确的把握。期望透过此个案,能够了解平、津报界自九一八事变后,历经“一·二八”事变,在不同阶段对中日关系和救亡图存的基本态度,并管窥民营报刊在具体历史语境下,自我标榜与新闻实践之间的裂痕,由此探讨20世纪30年代平津报界“营业化转型”的历史局限性。
This article takes the period from 1931 to 1932 as the research period (Nanjing National Government took the policy of “no resistance” to the Japanese aggressors during the policy period) and took the original “real report” published from October 1931 to April 1932 , Summarized and sorted out the main points of the 134 articles published in the front page so as to grasp the change of the basic position and argument of this newspaper in this period. At the same time, with reference to the related studies of journalism and journalism and historiography circles, the author compares the similarities and differences between the “real reports” and the views of other newspapers in Ping-Jin and Jin Dynasties in order to get a more accurate picture of the features of the newspaper’s arguments and the commonalities of the remarks in the same period in Pingjin grasp. It is hoped that through this case, we can understand the basic attitudes of the press circles in the various stages of the Sino-Japanese relations and the salvation after the September 18 Incident and the “January 28 Incident” and give a glimpse of the private newspapers’ Under the historical context, self-flaunting and the rift between news practice, thus discussing the historical limitation of “the transformation of commercialization” of the press in Binjin in the 1930s.