论文部分内容阅读
随着开放进一步扩大,特别是随着中国入世, “双赢”两字出现的频率越来越高,仿佛一谈合作就必致“双赢”结果。 透视一些地方的开放现状,虽然言必谈“双赢”,实际难达目的。有的地方政策一变再变,似乎不把税费降至全球、全国最低就不算“优惠”。本来资源、劳力、水、电、土地等综合成本就低,加上利益分配上的一再迁让, “利润最大化”就成外方专利。即便如此,仍有人美其名曰:“肥水”跑了,可“和尚跑了庙还在”;利润流失,厂房跑不了。这种自我安慰法、精神胜利法,与“双赢”追求相距千
With the opening up further expanded, especially with China’s accession to the WTO, the words “win-win” appear more and more frequently. It seems as if the cooperation will result in a “win-win” outcome. Looking at the current situation of opening up in some places, although it is necessary to talk about “win-win” situations, it is actually difficult to achieve the goal. Some local policies change again and again, it seems that the tax will not be reduced to the world, the country’s lowest is not “preferential.” Originally, resources, labor, water, electricity, land and other comprehensive low-cost, coupled with the repeated transfer of benefits distribution, “profit maximization” became a patent. Even so, there are still people in the name of the United States said: “fertilizer” ran, but “the monk ran the temple is still” loss of profits, plant can not run. This kind of self-comforting law and spiritual victory law are far away from “win-win” pursuit