论文部分内容阅读
在名山之作《廿四史》中,“天文志”有它特殊的地位,它们是研究中国科技发展史,特别是天文学史取材的宝库。然而,这些宝贵的文献资料在漫长的流传过程中,都有许多舛乱讹误的现象发生,致使原始资料失真,给今天的研究工作带来诸多不便和困难。例如《晋书·天文志》,虽经清代学者卢文弨、周家禄、劳格,以及当今学人的辛勤校订,但仍然存在着不少错误。即如中华书局标点本《晋书》,虽是上乘之作,堪称善本,但是,笔者在使用《天文志》时,方知其中漏校之处比比皆是,赫然在目。今试作补校,以尽绵薄,不当之处,尚祈专家指正。《天文》上
In the famous “Twenty-four Histories”, “Astronomy” has its special status. They are the treasure houses for studying the history of the development of science and technology in China, especially the history of astronomy. However, during the long process of dissemination, these valuable documents and materials have caused many confusion and corruption. As a result, the original materials have been distorted, bringing many inconveniences and difficulties to the research work of today. For example, “Jin Shu Tian Wen Zhi”, although by the Qing Dynasty scholars Lu Wen 弨, Zhou Jialu, Lao Ge, and scholars today’s hard school, but there are still many errors. That is, as the Zhonghua Book Company punctuated the “Book of Jin”, although it is superior to, called a rare book, but I use the “astronomical blog”, where we know the missing school everywhere, impressively. Try to make up for school today, to make meager, inappropriate, Shang Chi experts correct. Astronomy