论文部分内容阅读
目的 以口腔颌面部间隙感染患者为例，评价优质护理理念在护理中的应用效果。方法 本次将我院在2018年2月至2019年1月收治的60例口腔颌面部间隙感染患者作为研究对象，按随机数字表法分成两个不同的组别，每组平均30例；其中对照组给予常规护理，观察组给予优质护理，护理结束后分析比较两组临床护理效果。结果 ①在焦虑自评量表（SAS）评分、抑郁自评量表（SDS）评分方面，观察组护理前分别为（45.82±1.34）分、（46.90±1.32）分，护理后分别为（13.04±1.61）分、（14.89±1.32）分；“,”Objective To analyze and evaluate the application effect of quality nursing concept in patients with oral and maxillofacial space infection. Methods Sixty cases of patients with oral and maxillofacial space infection admitted to our hospital from February 2018 to January 2019 were selected as the research object. They were divided into two different groups according to random number table method， with an average of 30 cases in each group. Among them， the control group was given routine nursing， the observation group was given quality nursing， and the clinical nursing effect of the two groups was analyzed and compared after the end of nursing. Results (1) The scores of self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) and self-rating depression scale (SDS) in the observation group were (45.82±1.34) points and (46.90±1.32) points before nursing， and (13.04±1.61) points and (14.89±1.32) points after nursing， respectively. In the control group， the scores were (45.81±1.32) points and (46.93±1.31) points before nursing， and (26.87±1.68) points and (29.83±1.37) points after nursing. There were no significant differences between the observation group before nursing SAS score， SDS score and the control group (t =1.293， 1.276， P ＞0.05). After nursing， the SAS score and SDS score of the observation group were lower than those of the control group， and the difference was statistically significant (P ＜0.05). (2) The results of this study showed that there was no significant difference in the NRS scores of the two groups at 10:00， 11:30， 16:00 and 17:30 before the intervention (P ＞0.05); after the intervention， the NRS scores of the two groups decreased at 10:00， 11:30， 16:00 and 17:30， and the observation group was significantly lower than the control group (P ＜0.05). (3) The scores of psychological disorder， physiological disorder， physiological pain， social difficulty， psychological communication， functional limitation and disability in the observation group were higher than those in the control group (P ＜0.05). (4) After nursing， the observation group was significantly lower than the control group (t =8.265， 8.253， P ＜0.05). The total incidence of complications in the observation group 2 cases (6.67%) was significantly lower than that in the control group 6 cases (20.00%)， and there was a significant difference between the two groups (χ 2=9.286， P ＜0.05). (5) In terms of overall nursing satisfaction， the observation group of 28 cases (93.33%)， and the control group of 21 cases (70.00%) contrast was significantly higher， there was a significant difference between the two groups (χ 2=9.356， P ＜0.05). Conclusion For patients with oral and maxillofacial space infection， giving high-quality nursing care has obvious effect， can promote the improvement of patients\' psychological state， make the incidence of complications was effectively reduced， and further improve the overall satisfaction of patients with nursing services.