论文部分内容阅读
西方价格听证制度是建立在程序理念发达的法治背景之上,而我国价格听证仍摆脱不了“重实体”观念的影响,在听证的正式与非正式、公开与不公开方面,我国定价听证也与国外有着相应的区别。因此,要完善我国的定价听证制度,必须从以上几方面加大改善力度,选择程序法治化的路径,厘定听证类型,并设置基本的听证公开为主导的原则,施之以法治保障。由此,我国的定价听证制度才能获得新的发展契机。
The system of hearing of Western prices is based on the rule of law with developed concept of procedure. However, the price hearing of our country still can not get rid of the influence of the concept of “substantial entity”. In the formal and informal hearing, the public hearing and the non-public hearing, There are also the corresponding differences with foreign countries. Therefore, to improve China’s pricing hearing system, we must increase efforts to improve the above aspects, choose the path of legalization of the procedure, determine the type of hearing, and set the basic principle of public hearing as the leading principle. As a result, China’s pricing hearing system can get new opportunities for development.