论文部分内容阅读
在这座城市,一年来,多项政府决策被卷入大辩论中,其中一些得以搁置或修改。温和、闲散的成都人,在主张权益时表现出的坚持也令人侧目。2006年12月1日,邢连超收到一审判决书,这位34岁的律师再度败诉了。不过,他状告成都两家具有政府背景的公司设置三河场收费站违规收费一案,赢得了众多成都人的支持,其中一次上书就征集到上万个网络签名。因此,邢连超并不打算就此认输。这位4年前来蓉的山东人,近年来已折腾了十来件这样的事情:起诉成都机场高速公路有限公司侵犯公民对公共设施的免费通行权,起诉成都交警设置电子眼严苛执法,而在2006年年初轰动成都的“大年票”争议中,他也是活跃者之一。
In the city, over the past year, a number of government decisions have been drawn into the debate, some of which have been shelved or modified. Moderate, idle Chengdu people, in advocating rights and interests demonstrated perseverance is striking. December 1, 2006, Xing Lian Chao received the verdict of first instance, the 34-year-old lawyer lost again. However, he sued two government-backed companies in Chengdu for setting toll charges at the Three Rivers toll booths and won the support of many Chengdu people. One of them sent a letter to collect tens of thousands of Internet signatures. Therefore, Xing Lian Chao does not intend to admit defeat. The Shandong native who came to Chengdu four years ago has tossed over 10 such cases in recent years: suing Chengdu Airport Expressway Co., Ltd. for violating citizens’ free right of access to public facilities, prosecuting Chengdu traffic police to set strict rules on electronic eye protection, and He was also an active player in the “big ticket” controversy that hit Chengdu in early 2006.