论文部分内容阅读
间接正犯因与共犯特别是教唆犯具有相似的行为外观,如何清晰地界定间接正犯就显得尤为困难。本文主张,应当以间接正犯为中心,先考虑是否成立间接正犯,在不构成间接正犯的前提下才考虑有无成立教唆犯的可能;犯罪事实支配理论应当作为界分间接正犯与教唆犯的理论支撑,对犯罪事实的支配,应理解为对构成要件行为的支配,以及对法益侵害、危害结果的支配。本文立足于犯罪事实支配理论,以更加细化的原则为标准就理论上存在争议的类型进行了具体分析。
Indirect Coroners It is particularly difficult to define indirect indirect guilty clearly because of the appearance of behaviors similar to those of accomplices, especially abettors. This paper holds that indirect indirect criminals should be the center, first consider whether to establish indirect principal, without considering the existence of indirect offender under the premise of the possibility of the establishment of abettor; the theory of the criminal de facto control should be used as a division of indirect and actual abettor theory Support and control over the facts of crime should be understood as the domination of the constitutional requirements and the domination over the interests of law and the endangering of the result. Based on the theory of criminal fact domination, this article makes a concrete analysis on the types of controversial theorems with more elaborate principles as criteria.