论文部分内容阅读
在日常生活中,先试用后购买的商品交易几乎是司空见惯的事情。看似简单的买卖却给 B 君上了一堂严肃的法制课。2000年1月26日,B 君与 A 商店签订试用买卖合同,B 君欲购买商店价值1200元的皮衣一件,试用期为一个月,试用期内试穿满意则购买,反之则退回。在春节的喜庆气氛中,B 君穿着皮衣不知不觉便过了一个月。3月10日,B 君到 A 商店称皮衣款式陈旧,不想买了,可得到的是冷冰冰的答复:试衣服已过试用期,不买也得买,要么承担违约责任。B 君上法院咨询,得到的答复与 A 商店答复的一样。为免于承担违约责任发生诉累,B 君只好如数付款继续穿皮衣。我国《合同法》(1999年10月1日实
In everyday life, it is almost a commonplace to try out the first post-purchase commodity. Seemingly simple trading gave B Jun took a serious legal class. January 26, 2000, B Jun and A store signed a trial sale contract, B Jun want to buy a store worth 1,200 yuan a leather, the probation period of one month, the trial period try on the purchase, otherwise, returned. In the festive atmosphere of the Spring Festival, B Jun wearing a leather unknowingly had a month. March 10, B Jun to A store called leather style obsolete, do not want to buy, you can get a cold reply: try the clothes have been over the trial period, do not buy have to buy, or assume liability for breach of contract. B Jun consult the court, the answer is the same as A store reply. In order to avoid liability for breach of contract, B Jun had to continue wearing leather clothes. China's “Contract Law” (October 1, 1999 real