论文部分内容阅读
胡塞尔晚年的《几何学起源》一文,表达了他的现象学哲学的神秘渴望,即讨论观念的起源问题,这就把时间哲学问题纳入了哲学思考。德里达对这篇文章做了详细的解构式阅读,指出胡塞尔在“时间”、“起源”、“历史性”等一系列重要概念上,还保存着传统形而上学的痕迹,因为胡塞尔“理性”的态度使他忽视了这些概念是如何出场的细节。德里达通过“延异”或“推迟”概念,揭示出这些细节是一种悖谬的思想过程,由于胡塞尔在文中处处回避概念出场过程中的自相矛盾现象,从而事实上将其所涉及的时间概念的含义视为某种现成的意思,因此没有还原出思想的原样即思想的细节。德里达对胡塞尔的批评之所以重要,在于它开启了“解构论”哲学的可能性。
Husserl’s later article, The Origins of Geometry, expresses the mysterious desire of his phenomenological philosophy, that is, to discuss the origin of ideas, which takes time and philosophy into his philosophical thinking. Derrida made a detailed deconstructive reading of this article, pointing out that Husserl preserved a series of important concepts such as “time”, “origin”, “historicity” and also preserved the traditional metaphysics Traces, because Husserl’s “rational” attitude led him to ignore the details of how these concepts are played. Derrida’s concept of “variation ” or “postpone ” revealed that these details are a kind of absurd thought process. Due to the self-contradictory phenomenon Husserl evaded the concept appearance in the text, in fact The meaning of the concept of time involved in it is regarded as a ready-made meaning, thus failing to restore the details of the original thought, that is, thought. Derrida’s criticism of Husserl is so important because it opens up the possibility of “deconstruction” philosophy.